Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!tank!eecae!netnews.upenn.edu!grasp.cis.upenn.edu!strasser
From: strasser@grasp.cis.upenn.edu (Colin Strasser)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Portable Mac vs STACY
Message-ID: <15430@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 12 Oct 89 17:04:05 GMT
References: <2122@kodak.UUCP> <45da3096.14a1f@force.UUCP> <10032@stag.math.lsa.umich.edu> <1627@cbnewse.ATT.COM>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: strasser@grasp.cis.upenn.edu.UUCP (Colin Strasser)
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 17

In article <1627@cbnewse.ATT.COM> macduff@cbnewse.ATT.COM (Roger R. Espinosa) writes:
>In article <10032@stag.math.lsa.umich.edu>, hyc@math.lsa.umich.edu (Howard Chu) writes:
>
>Is it too expensive? You betcha. The biggest gripe is the memory: the *most* 
>expensive memory chips are required (Static DRAMS), and of course, come a year,
>you're gonna NEED that expensive RAM to run the new system software.
>
>Roger


Isn't "static DRAM" an oxymoron?


					-Colin

Colin Strasser	
stasser@eniac.seas.upenn.edu	CI$: 72447,1650