Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen From: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: 2 users on a 386 Keywords: ignorant, I'm afraid Message-ID: <964@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> Date: 10 Oct 89 15:02:49 GMT References: <2344@hydra.gatech.EDU> Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) Organization: GE Corp R&D Center Lines: 35 In article <2344@hydra.gatech.EDU>, russ@prism.gatech.EDU (Russell Shackelford) writes: | 2 questions: | | 1. HOW does one go about hanging a terminal off a 386 box, allowing | 2 concurrent DOS users. What are the options? Pro's and con's? There are two ways to do this. You can run a DOS splitter like Desqview, start a 2nd session and do "CTTY COM1" to allow the 2nd user. Going that way will only allow you to run a limited number of applications. The other way is to get UNIX software and run DOS under UNIX. This will probably be more reliable and allows you to use the UNIX system administration software. I would suggest Xenix from SCO because it uses a little less memory than other flavors of UNIX, it is older and more mature, and I have had better luck teaching non-programmers to use the administration tools for backup, etc. | | 2. Is this smart or dumb? You have tradeoffs of complexity and reliability. With two machines you have a better chance that at least one will be up at any given time, but you also have twice the chance that one will be down. With two machines you always have the chance that the files will get out of sync, or that you will move files in the wrong direction and copy the older version on top of the new. You will need a terminal to operate for the 2nd user. You can have anything from quite dumb to a full emulation of a PC running at fiber optic speeds. Speed co$ts. -- bill davidsen (davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM -or- uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen) "The world is filled with fools. They blindly follow their so-called 'reason' in the face of the church and common sense. Any fool can see that the world is flat!" - anon