Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!chuq From: chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Is Apple Dumping Mac IIs? Message-ID: <35590@apple.Apple.COM> Date: 12 Oct 89 17:54:00 GMT References: <5789@tank.uchicago.edu> Distribution: na Organization: Life is just a Fantasy novel played for keeps Lines: 40 >>I suppose it makes some sense since Apple now has >>the IIcx,i and IIx. But I bought a Mac II in the first >>place on the grounds that its six slots would enable it >>to be upgraded as the technology advanced. Apple's >>strategy of obsoleting it seems to be a betrayal of >>that reasonable, to my mind, expectation. A Mac II can be upgraded to a IIx. The six slot format is definitely not dead, since the IIx is still a current product. It's also silly to speculate that the II is going to be obsolete -- Apple couldn't afford to do that. Not only are there lots and lots of them out there in the real world, it's been the machine of choice internal at Apple -- the thought of having to upgrade all the Mac II's we have here would put the wrath of accountants into anybody.... >It seems at times that _whatever_ Apple does, it's accused of being a heartless >money-hoarding capitalist giant. Sheesh! You get used to it. Sort of. >That doesn't mean that a Mac II itself is >obsolete: although you can't upgrade it to a IIci, You can, though, upgrade to a IIx. Or add a PMMU and run System 7.0 when avaialble without upgrading to a 68030. Or leave it alone and run System 7.0 when available without virtual memory. The Mac II has a lot of life left... In fact, when I finally upgraded my home machine I went with a Mac II, not a IIx. Why? Because I decided I would rather save some cash buying a slightly slower machine and use it for a two page display instead.... -- Chuq Von Rospach <+> Editor,OtherRealms <+> Member SFWA/ASFA chuq@apple.com <+> CI$: 73317,635 <+> [This is myself speaking] Anyone who thinks that the argument over {sci,rec}.fishies is about group names doesn't understand the system.