Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: gam@cvedc.prime.com (Gregory Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re:Sunsets -Errata
Keywords: Miscellaneous
Message-ID: <1956@brazos.Rice.edu>
Date: 4 Oct 89 22:49:28 GMT
Sender: root@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 22
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 152, message 2 of 6

This is my LAST remark on the subject.

Tad (somebody) from cd.odu.edu recently sent me mail regarding my comment 
about Sun's "review" of the Digest:

>...  Are you actually implying that (internally) Sun is
>moderating Sun-Spots and is removing articles flaming Sun from their
>internal distributions...

NO, I am not. Allow me to clarify my misuse of vocabulary.  I stated that
Sun internally moderates the Digest and I hoped that they really listen to
our constructive criticism and *do* something.  

"MODERATES" was the *wrong* word.  Obviously Sun does not sanitize the
digest and redistribute it.  I should have said "MONITORS."  I apologize
to all who misinterpreted my words.

How `bout we all get back to the business of helping each other use and
enhance the Sun product? :-)

-All the Best, again my apologies
-Gregory