Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen
From: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: uucp with tcp on 386/ix vers 2.0.2
Summary: Why not use spooling
Keywords: uucp tcp 386/ix
Message-ID: <983@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Date: 10 Oct 89 19:50:04 GMT
References: <255@cipher.UUCP> <182@inpnms.UUCP>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corp R&D Center
Lines: 16

In article <182@inpnms.UUCP>, logan@inpnms.UUCP (James Logan) writes:
|  
|  What's wrong with the rshl(1) command?  If you are on machine "A"
|  and the printer is on machine "Z", just use:  
|  
|  	rshl Z lp <filename;

  Unless this is a one time hack, why not just setup a printer queue for
it. I have queues on most of my machines to most others, some via rsh
(aka rshl or rcmd) and some by uux. That way when I want PostScript
output I "lpr -dps1 FILE" on any machine.
-- 
bill davidsen	(davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM -or- uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen)
"The world is filled with fools. They blindly follow their so-called
'reason' in the face of the church and common sense. Any fool can see
that the world is flat!" - anon