Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!aunro!atha!lyndon
From: lyndon@cs.AthabascaU.CA (Lyndon Nerenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: compile times...
Message-ID: <1148@atha.AthabascaU.CA>
Date: 9 Oct 89 22:47:48 GMT
References: <6709@hubcap.clemson.edu> <4152@itivax.iti.org>
Organization: Athabasca University
Lines: 19
Summary: Not necessarily I/O bandwidth

In article <4152@itivax.iti.org> scs@itivax.iti.org (Steve Simmons) writes:
>Seriously, I/O bandwidth is what separates mainframes from workstations
>from minis.  Compilation is I/O intensive, particularly if your compiler
>drives your 3100 into heavy swapping or paging.  Retime those compilation
>tests and look at system times vs. wall clock time.  I think you'll see
>some telling numbers.

Umm ... we just finished running some tests between a Sun 4/60 and a
Sun 4/370. The NFS throughput between these machines (4/370 as server)
was faster than our 785 gets to its LOCAL disks! (Ultrix 2.3 and RA81's).

Of course my argument is predicated on the 785 being considered
a mainframe :-) [ And the 4/60 not being considered one ... ]

-- 
Lyndon Nerenberg  VE6BBM / Computing Services / Athabasca University
  {alberta,decwrl,lsuc}!atha!lyndon || lyndon@cs.AthabascaU.CA
     "I think every man should have a wife.  You can't blame
         everything on the government."  -- Jed Clampett