Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ginosko!uunet!dsi!dan
From: dan@dsi.COM (Dan Mick)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: ls -A
Message-ID: <268@dsi.COM>
Date: 9 Oct 89 17:55:12 GMT
References: <15@minya.UUCP> <14611@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <1989Oct7.191435.26382@rpi.edu> <1248@virtech.UUCP> <6466@ficc.uu.net>
Reply-To: dan@dsi.UUCP (Dan Mick)
Distribution: na
Organization: KFW Corporation, Newbury Park, CA
Lines: 10

In article <6466@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>Another difference in 'ls' when you're root, of course, is that you get the
>owner and group displayed in the 'ls -l' listing, instead of just the owner.
>
>This is nice, though surprising to new super-users.
>
>How do you get this behaviour when you're NOT root? ls -g just gives the group
>and not the owner.

ls -lg