Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!csinc!rpeglar
From: rpeglar@csinc.UUCP (Rob Peglar x615)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: SCO UNIX 3.2 difficulty
Summary: How about TB T2500's?  Same deal?
Keywords: modem
Message-ID: <123@csinc.UUCP>
Date: 5 Oct 89 15:08:12 GMT
References: <832@eecea.eece.ksu.edu> <833@eecea.eece.ksu.edu> <111042@nstar.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Control Systems, Inc., St. Paul MN
Lines: 24

In article <111042@nstar.UUCP>, larry@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder) writes:
> > I guess that means that all you TB+ people out there had better be ready
> > to go to 9600 when you upgrade to UNIX 3.2.  
> 
> That is indeed bad news..  I plan on upgrading next spring after most
> of the "glitches" are worked out.  
> 


How about Telebit T2500's?  Same bad news?  I can't believe it.  We
run a T2500 at 19.2, very successfully, to uunet.  19.2 performance
and Telebit's great reliability at that speed was the crucial procurement
factor for us.  

BTW, on Xenix 2.3.2GT.  We have a developer's agreement with SCO for
Unix 3.2 and ODT, and this is the first piece of *really* bad news
so far.

Sigh.

Rob


...uunet!csinc!rpeglar