Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ginosko!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!eutrc3!euteal!mart
From: mart@ele.tue.nl (Mart van Stiphout)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Xlib graphics within widgets
Message-ID: <124@euteal.ele.tue.nl>
Date: 12 Oct 89 08:48:05 GMT
References: <1915@bacchus.dec.com> <8910111913.AA14172@expo.lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Lines: 13

In article <8910111913.AA14172@expo.lcs.mit.edu> kit@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Chris D. Peterson) writes:
>A better, better solution is to write your own widget to do the job.  This is
>after all one of the main design goals of the toolkit (easy subclassablility.)

What I don't understand is why neither widget set available
has a widget just for drawing. Doesn't anyone want to draw???
In fact drawing is my main activity (schematics entry, simulation
output postprocessor). Is this such a weird action??


Mart van Stiphout
mart@ele.tue.nl
(It's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop)