Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!twwells!bill From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: The Inode-Eating Bug Message-ID: <1989Oct9.140605.21949@twwells.com> Date: 9 Oct 89 14:06:05 GMT References: <906@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <231@rsiatl.UUCP> <1989Oct7.213314.17921@twwells.com> <282@rsiatl.UUCP> Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale, FL Lines: 51 In article <282@rsiatl.UUCP> jgd@rsiatl.UUCP (John G. De Armond) writes: : In article <1989Oct7.213314.17921@twwells.com> bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) writes: : >Apologies, but your scripts do little or nothing to solve the problem. : > : >First: the inode crash can occur regardless of the number of available : >inodes on your system. : > : >Second: the crash can occur almost instantly after you have done a : >fsck, so doing it frequently does not eliminate the problem. : > : : Please cite an example of how a crash can occure right after an fsck. I had the following experience: run out of inodes fsck the file system restart the news job run out of inodes fsck the file system restart the news job run out of inodes fsck the file system restart the news job run out of inodes fsck the file system do some random file creates and deletes to change the inode cache restart the news job phew! it worked So the answer is: it has happened. : From a practical perspective, these scripts have reduced the inode problem : on stiatl at my former employer from perhaps twice daily on the news partition : to NEVER. (We were forced to run a tight disk so we are close to the : hairy edge most of the time). On rsiatl here, the scripts have also : totally eliminated the problem. That's kinda the bottom line. Well, you've been lucky. I suppose that running fsck frequently would reduce the probability of the crash; the bug *can* result in gradual loss of inodes. But the bug can also result in catastrophic loss of inodes and your scripts won't protect you against that. Do yourself a favor and get one of the real fixes. Among other things, they don't cost anywhere near as much CPU time or disk activity or downed file system time. And they *completely* eliminate the possibility of this particular crash. --- Bill { uunet | novavax | ankh | sunvice } !twwells!bill bill@twwells.com