Xref: utzoo news.groups:13032 alt.flame:10640
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!uvaarpa!hb
From: hb@uvaarpa.virginia.edu (Hank Bovis)
Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.flame
Subject: Re: ****   Call for Discussion  --  Creation of Sci.Aquaria   ****
Summary: Rec is better than sci is better than alt
Message-ID: <988@uvaarpa.virginia.edu>
Date: 9 Oct 89 12:44:27 GMT
References: <20503@gryphon.COM> <broken> <20649@gryphon.COM>
Reply-To: hb@Virginia.EDU (Hank Bovis)
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: University of Virginia, Charlottesville
Lines: 14

In article <20649@gryphon.COM> richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton) writes:
>In article <1989Oct6.230732.11458@agate.berkeley.edu> gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith) writes:
>>  I'm going to feel almost duty-bound to flame at times on
>>sci.aquaria, so watch it.
>That would not altogether be a bad thing. We like your flames Gene. ...

That tears it.  If it's going to be a damn mutual admiration society it
should be a soc group.  But should it be soc.aquaria.flame or
soc.flame.aqaria?

Seriously, my preference would be a rec group, but I'd vote for either.

Hank Bovis
(hb@Virginia.EDU, hb@Virginia.BITNET)