Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uwvax!rang From: rang@cs.wisc.edu (Anton Rang) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Call for Discussion - Sci.Aquaria Message-ID: Date: 9 Oct 89 14:02:41 GMT References: <20503@gryphon.COM> <1989Oct5.051050.1910@agate.berkeley.edu> <17105@rpp386.cactus.org> <17110@rpp386.cactus.org> Sender: news@spool.cs.wisc.edu Organization: UW-Madison CS department Lines: 13 In-reply-to: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org's message of 9 Oct 89 06:10:26 GMT In article <17110@rpp386.cactus.org> jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) writes: >Tell me how many other rec groups have the potential to kill an >entire tank full of expensive marine ickys with one stupid posting. >THAT is the reason the group should be sci.aquaria. The name isn't going to make any difference once somebody finds the group. This might be an argument for moderation, but I don't see that it's a good argument for the name.... +----------------------------------+------------------+ | Anton Rang (grad student) | rang@cs.wisc.edu | | University of Wisconsin--Madison | | +----------------------------------+------------------+