Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!pallas!wally
From: wally@pallas.UUCP (Wally Hartshorn)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: ****   Call for Discussion  --  Creation of Sci.Aquaria   ****
Summary: Flames in rec.aquarium?  I find that hard to imagine.  
	 Why not rec.aquarium and rec.aquarium.tech?
Message-ID: <170@pallas.UUCP>
Date: 9 Oct 89 16:06:38 GMT
References: <broken> <20538@gryphon.COM> <35239@apple.Apple.COM> <2660@cpoint.U
Organization: Athenanet, Inc., Springfield, IL
Lines: 7

Flames in rec.aquarium?  ...About what?  I don't own an aquarium yet, but I  
just can't think of anything that would get someone worked up enough to  
flame over in a topic like that. 
  
As for the problem of serious vs. novice aquariasts (sp?), perhaps a 
"*.tech" subgroup would be needed for the more techy stuff, leaving the  
general "rec.aquarium" group for the novices such as myself.