Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ginosko!uunet!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!ukc!inmos!des
From: des@yatton.inmos.co.uk (David Shepherd)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: ****   Call for Discussion  --  Creation of Sci.Aquaria   ****
Message-ID: <2476@ganymede.inmos.co.uk>
Date: 10 Oct 89 08:41:40 GMT
References: <20503@inmos.co.uk>
Sender: news@inmos.co.uk
Reply-To: des@inmos.co.uk (David Shepherd)
Organization: INMOS Limited, Bristol, UK.
Lines: 16

In article <165@inmos.co.uk (Wally Hartshorn) writes:
>However, if there is room in the newsgroup for such imbeciles as myself, 
>then I think that the proper name would be rec.pets.aquaria.  Here's why:

(discussion of other names)
>sci.*
>rec.aquaria
>rec.fish 
>rec.pets.fish
>rec.pets.aquaria

Given the popularity (on both sides of the Atlantic) of "A fish called Wanda"
shouldn't we have rec.food.aquaria as well ;-)

david shepherd
INMOS ltd