Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!servax0!alan
From: alan@servax0.essex.ac.uk (Stanier A)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call for Discussion - Sci.Aquaria
Message-ID: <2086@servax0.essex.ac.uk>
Date: 10 Oct 89 14:09:47 GMT
References: <20503@gryphon.COM> <1989Oct5.051050.1910@agate.berkeley.edu> <17105@rpp386.cactus.org> <17110@rpp386.cactus.org>
Reply-To: alan@essex.ac.uk (Stanier A)
Organization: University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Lines: 16

In article <17110@rpp386.cactus.org> jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) writes:
?Tell me how many other rec groups have the potential to kill an
?entire tank full of expensive marine ickys with one stupid posting.
?THAT is the reason the group should be sci.aquaria.

You mean, if I were to post "Fish do very well in concentrated hydrochloric
acid" in rec.aquaria, then the expensive fish you have imprisoned would die,
but if I were to post it in sci.aquaria then they would survive?

Naming is more important than I realised.

-- 
Alan  M  Stanier	*   University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, England
email alan@essex.ac.uk	|
voice +44 206-872153	|
  fax +44 206-860585    |  There is always time for Sloth, Gluttony, and Lust