Xref: utzoo sci.skeptic:1199 news.groups:13084
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!cadre.dsl.pitt.edu!pitt!unix.cis.pitt.edu!bamst3
From: bamst3@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Brian A. Mermon)
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,news.groups
Subject: Re: sci.skeptic? talk.skeptic!
Message-ID: <19920@unix.cis.pitt.edu>
Date: 10 Oct 89 17:01:38 GMT
References: <4287@sugar.hackercorp.com> <4184@yunexus.UUCP> <1989Oct7.100321.5027@agate.berkeley.edu> <4204@yunexus.UUCP> <4319@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Reply-To: bamst3@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Brian A. Mermon)
Organization: Univ. of Pittsburgh, Comp & Info Services
Lines: 7

In article <4204@yunexus.UUCP> gall@yunexus.UUCP (Norman R. Gall) writes:
>that will post the sorts of things that I proposed.  Talk.sckeptic
>would have been all crap rather than the 80% figure I calculate now.

One man's Crap is another man's goldmine.  Talk."sckeptic" is full of "gold".

Brian