Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!eutrc3!wsdwgk
From: wsdwgk@eutrc3.urc.tue.nl (g.v.rooij)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: A Funny Feeling About This Fish Thing
Message-ID: <963@eutrc3.urc.tue.nl>
Date: 10 Oct 89 13:40:28 GMT
References: <20645@gryphon.COM> <4638@ncar.ucar.edu>
Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Lines: 18

Hmmm. All this talk about 100 no votes is clearly useless as we are watching
a new way of creating groups develop. The way it's done ?
- propose a group
- create controversy
- swamp news.groups with hundreds of useless arguments on how other people's
  hobbies are rubish and how divine theirs is...
- someone creates tre group they want just to get the traffic out of news.
  groups

There it is, and there is not much we can do about it i'm afraid. I will
oppose to sci.* for everything concerning their fish. Give 'em a rec group
or a fish dinner.
Someone stated that as the sci. people were clearly more well-spoken and
had better arguments, he would vote in their favour. Don't forget that for
something as elementary as this I don't have to indulge in pages full of
rhetoric to prove it, and it should not be expected of me...

Greetings, Guido