Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!decwrl!shlump.nac.dec.com!ryn.esg.dec.com!pstjtt.enet.dec.com!taber
From: taber@pstjtt.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: This fish thing.  What's the big deal?
Message-ID: <518@ryn.esg.dec.com>
Date: 11 Oct 89 15:43:12 GMT
Sender: guest@ryn.esg.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 20

In article <17127@rpp386.cactus.org>, jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) writes...
> 
>There is no reason =not= to put aquaria into sci other
>than this religious nonsense regarding the purity of
>the namespace and I'm hear to tell you the lady is a
>tramp ...

The same line of reasoning says there's no reason not to put it in rec.
That means there are (at least) two choices and THAT means that people
will disagree as to which is "right."  This prediction is validated by
observation.  

The seditious implication that people should DO something rather than 
impotently argue about elegance doesn't even deserve the bandwidth to 
forward it to hell.

                >>>==>PStJTT
			Patrick St. Joseph Teahan Taber

Mail address:  ahhhhh, you don't want to send me mail....