Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!ginosko!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!xanth!lll-winken!sun-barr!newstop!sun!coherent!mrspoc!kayvan From: kayvan@mrspoc.Transact.COM (Kayvan Sylvan) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Voting, single transferrable vote, etc Message-ID: Date: 12 Oct 89 09:32:53 GMT References: <8910081919.AA15665@helios.enea.se> <3315@watale.waterloo.edu> <2673@cpoint.UUCP> Sender: kayvan@mrspoc.Transact.COM (Kayvan Sylvan) Organization: Transact Software, Inc. Lines: 22 In-reply-to: alien@cpoint.UUCP's message of 11 Oct 89 18:49:47 GMT >>>>> "Alien" == Alien Wells writes: Alien> There is a much easier way to solve all this, simply, Alien> understandably, and without all the mess that I've seen Alien> proposed. Alien> When a call for votes is proposed, include ALL proposed names. Alien> Each person voting votes yes/no on EACH name. A voter simply Alien> votes YES on all the names he would find acceptable, and NO on Alien> all the names he does not. I *like* this idea!!! It's simple and seems to have all the advantages of many of the other voting schemes proposed. ---Kayvan -- Kayvan Sylvan @ Transact Software, Inc. -*- Los Altos, CA (415) 961-6112 Internet: kayvan@Transact.COM -*- UUCP: ...!{apple,pyramid,mips}!mrspoc!kayvan = Interested in story telling group? Mail yarn-spinners-request@transact.com =