Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rice!cathyf From: cathyf@rice.edu (Catherine A. Foulston) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Voting, single transferrable vote, etc Summary: A great idea! Message-ID: <2056@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 12 Oct 89 15:58:12 GMT References: <8910081919.AA15665@helios.enea.se> <3315@watale.waterloo.edu> <2673@cpoint.UUCP> Reply-To: cathyf@rice.edu (Catherine A. Foulston) Followup-To: news.groups Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas Lines: 27 In article kayvan@mrspoc.Transact.COM (Kayvan Sylvan) writes: >>>>> "Alien" == Alien Wells writes: Alien> When a call for votes is proposed, include ALL proposed names. Alien> Each person voting votes yes/no on EACH name. A voter simply Alien> votes YES on all the names he would find acceptable, and NO on Alien> all the names he does not. Kayvan>I *like* this idea!!! Kayvan>It's simple and seems to have all the advantages of many of the other Kayvan>voting schemes proposed. Kayvan> ---Kayvan I like it too! It also allows easy abstention, for those who don't care. If you don't want sci.painting for naming reasons, but you don't care about (or don't think you are qualified to vote on) rec.painting, then you submit a NO vote for sci.painting and you don't submit any vote on rec.painting. -Cathy Cathy Foulston cathyf@rice.edu =||= ...uunet!rice!cathyf =||= CFOUL00@RICEVM1[.bitnet] A bit of tolerance is worth a megabyte of flaming. --Henry Spencer But if you *must* flame me, do the group a favor and use email. -- me