Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!bu-cs!xylogics!cloud9!jjmhome!cpoint!alien
From: alien@cpoint.UUCP (Alien Wells)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: ****   Call for Bogosity Ratings  --  Creation of Sci.Aquaria   ****
Message-ID: <2677@cpoint.UUCP>
Date: 12 Oct 89 20:18:52 GMT
References: <2213@cbnewsd.ATT.COM > <3182@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu > <152@ark1.nswc.navy.mil > <2287@cbnewsd.ATT.COM> <156@ark1.nswc.navy.mil> <2674@cpoint.UUCP> <8239@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>
Reply-To: alien@cpoint.UUCP (Alien Wells)
Organization: Clearpoint Research Corp., Hopkinton Mass.
Lines: 17

In article <8239@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> bee@cs.purdue.edu (Zaphod Beeblebrox) writes:
>I think it's time to start rating the level of bogosity in these
>*.aquaria postings.  Logic like the above ("the people who post to the
>group should be the ones who decide where the group goes") is what
>gave us sci.skeptic and other such misnamed groups.  I rate this
>posting as having about 1 milligilly of bogosity.

It's clear you missed the entire point.  I was NOT saying that only people who
post to the group should decide, what I DID say is that only people who have
an idea WHAT the group IS should decide.

I grant you 27 milligillies ... ;-)
-- 
--------|	Sometimes I feel like a ball
Alien   |		in the great pinball game of life.
--------|   					- Steve Steir
     decvax!frog!cpoint!alien      bu-cs!mirror!frog!cpoint!alien