Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!agate!typhoon.Berkeley.EDU!gwh
From: gwh@typhoon.Berkeley.EDU (George William Herbert)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: sci.skeptic? talk.skeptic!
Message-ID: <1989Oct13.214025.14263@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 13 Oct 89 21:40:25 GMT
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Reply-To: gwh@typhoon.Berkeley.EDU (George William Herbert)
Organization: ucb
Lines: 22

In article <6516@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>Since removing a group is currently impossible... how about we conspire to
>convince Norman Gall, the brains behind sci.skeptic, to moderate the damned
>thing. I myself posted the only appropriate article in there for the last
>two weeks, and I got a better response from TIME magazine than from the
>supposedly hotshot paranormal debunkers.
>
>Alternatively, let's get CSICOP a feed and talk *them* into moderating it.

I like the moderate it idea.  It is getting _both_ junk and good stuff, and
I would personally (in order of preference):
	1. Moderate It, getting rid of the pointless junk
	2. Leave it as is.  I prefer to sift through than not get the
	stuff i DO read.

My two cents.


****************************************
George William Herbert  UCB Naval Architecture Dpt. (my god, even on schedule!)
maniac@garnet.berkeley.edu  gwh@ocf.berkeley.edu
----------------------------------------