Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: "Acceptance voting" Re: Voting, single transferrable vote, etc
Message-ID: <6531@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 14 Oct 89 02:04:03 GMT
References: <8910081919.AA15665@helios.enea.se> <3315@watale.waterloo.edu> <2673@cpoint.UUCP> <6518@ficc.uu.net> <5815@tank.uchicago.edu>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 12

In article <5815@tank.uchicago.edu> matt@oddjob.uchicago.edu (Matt Crawford) writes:
> I can't think how that would be necessary.  Under what criteria can the
> name with the most yes votes fail, but some other name pass?

	sci.rap		250 YES		200 NO
	rec.music.rap	120 YES		3 NO
	rec.rap		12 YES		200 NO
-- 
Peter da Silva, *NIX support guy @ Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
Biz: peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Fun: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com. `-_-'
                                                                           'U`
Quote: Structured Programming is a discipline -- not a straitjacket.