Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!shelby!portia!hanauma!joe From: joe@hanauma.stanford.edu (Joe Dellinger) Newsgroups: sci.bio Subject: Re: Ecosystemic Contamination Message-ID: <5715@portia.Stanford.EDU> Date: 10 Oct 89 05:32:47 GMT References: <8909272147.AA01656@aristotle.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> <2035@frog.UUCP> <5661@portia.Stanford.EDU> <767.25311054@csc.anu.oz> Sender: USENET News System Reply-To: joe@hanauma.stanford.edu (Joe Dellinger) Organization: Stanford University, Dept. of Geophysics Lines: 23 In article <767.25311054@csc.anu.oz> dxb105@csc.anu.oz (David Bofinger, Theoretical Physics, RSPhysS ANU) writes: > >I think the point was that South America was isolated. North America had a >(tenuous) link to the _real_ powerhouse of terrestrial evolution- Afro-Eurasia. >It wasn't North American mammals that colonised South America: it was Asian >ones, via the Bering strait. > >David Bofinger ACSNet: dxb105@phys0.anu.oz [@munnari.oz.au] (Australia) Guess you caught me there. Hope you're enjoying our Texan prickly-pear cactus! I think my point still stands, though (even though I admit it's more the exception than the rule). If North America wasn't so isolated, then how about: 1) Brazilian Water Hyacinths (taking over everywhere with a decent climate) 2) @#*$*^&@# British House Sparrows (far and away most common bird in almost all of North America, all descended from a handful released by some idiot.) 3) Grasses in California (the "golden hills" of California are caused by introduced grasses. I'm not sure where they came from.) \ /\ /\ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\.-.-.-.-.......___________ \ / \ / \ /Dept of Geophysics, Stanford University \/\/\.-.-....___ \/ \/ \/Joe Dellinger joe@hanauma.stanford.edu apple!hanauma!joe\/\.-._