Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cica!iuvax!rutgers!att!cbnews!military
From: demon@thor.wright.edu (Brett Kottman)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: Future of the Military
Message-ID: <10054@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Date: 10 Oct 89 01:56:12 GMT
References: <9881@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Lines: 15
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: demon@thor.wright.edu (Brett Kottman)

>From article <9881@cbnews.ATT.COM>, by amdcad!gwh%sandstorm.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (George William Herbert):
> 
> Of course, the problem assumed that we have to protect our posessions too, and
> so we'll still need conventional military.
>

	This seems to be the major thrust of our military.  Except for
our strategic forces (bomber/missile), the majority of our forces are
outside the country. (Can anyone provide stats?)

Brett Kottmann