Xref: utzoo alt.sources.d:128 alt.config:1209
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mgm.mit.edu!wolfgang
From: wolfgang@mgm.mit.edu (Wolfgang Rupprecht)
Newsgroups: alt.sources.d,alt.config
Subject: Re: moderation of alt.sources vs. automated harangues
Message-ID: <15110@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>
Date: 14 Oct 89 02:30:32 GMT
References: <2024@convex.UUCP> <1989Oct13.192835.1330@talos.uucp> <1989Oct14.012800.12049@rpi.edu>
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: wolfgang@BBN.COM (Wolfgang Rupprecht)
Followup-To: alt.sources.d
Organization: Freelance Software Consultant, Washington DC.
Lines: 8

I guess I don't get it.  If we moderate alt.sources how will it differ
from mod.sources, ahem, comp.sources.unix?  I always figured
alt.sources was the high-noise low-delay optimization.  Mod.sources is
on the other extreme.

-wolfgang
Wolfgang Rupprecht	ARPA:  wolfgang@mgm.mit.edu (IP 18.82.0.114)
TEL: (703) 768-2640	UUCP:  mit-eddie!mgm.mit.edu!wolfgang