Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!tale
From: tale@pawl.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence)
Newsgroups: alt.sources.d
Subject: Re: moderation of alt.sources vs. automated harangues
Message-ID: <1989Oct15.003835.9012@rpi.edu>
Date: 15 Oct 89 00:38:35 GMT
References: <2024@convex.UUCP> <1989Oct13.192835.1330@talos.uucp>
	<1989Oct14.012800.12049@rpi.edu> <2645@pur-phy>
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Lines: 15

Kyle> So moderate alt.sources.
Me> Sounds reasonable

In <2645@pur-phy> ray@dirac.physics.purdue.edu (Ray Moody) writes:
Ray> ... but there is a need for an unmoderated source group, and
Ray> alt.sources fills that need.

Okay, tell us what that need is.  You've not provided any sort of
argument here, only made a claim that you've not attempted to
substantiate.  At least counter the argument with something more than
"Does not, does not!"

Dave
-- 
 (setq mail '("tale@pawl.rpi.edu" "tale@itsgw.rpi.edu" "tale@rpitsmts.bitnet"))