Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!nuchat!sugar!karl
From: karl@sugar.hackercorp.com (Karl Lehenbauer)
Newsgroups: alt.sources.d
Subject: Re: moderation of alt.sources vs. automated harangues
Message-ID: <4380@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 18 Oct 89 00:59:19 GMT
References: <2645@pur-phy> <72@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM>
Reply-To: karl@sugar.hackercorp.com (Karl Lehenbauer)
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston
Lines: 16

In article <72@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM> baur@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM (Steven L. Baur) writes:
>What need?  (Just asking)

>I haven't seen anything in alt.sources that was worth the need of
>an unmoderated source group.

Yeah, there may not be a lot of need, but it is nice to just blast sources off
and know they'll go out, plus I just like anarchy.

>If I am wrong, flame me.

FWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!  :-)
-- 
-- uunet!sugar!karl	"There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that 
-- 			 flags do not wave in a vacuum."  -- Arthur C. Clarke
-- Usenet access: (713) 438-5018