Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!mips!mash From: mash@mips.COM (John Mashey) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: VLIW Architecture Keywords: VLIW Message-ID: <29400@winchester.mips.COM> Date: 13 Oct 89 08:59:58 GMT References: <251FCB3F.12366@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <1050@m3.mfci.UUCP> <13050@pur-ee.UUCP> <1630@l.cc.purdue.edu> <1989Oct5.025841.2046@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> <3449@alliant.Alliant.COM> <1071@m3.mfci.UUCP> <3460@alliant.Alliant.COM> <35596@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> Reply-To: mash@mips.COM (John Mashey) Organization: MIPS Computer Systems, Inc. Lines: 41 In article <35596@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> brooks@maddog.llnl.gov (Eugene Brooks) writes: .... >There is no defense against the ATTACK OF THE KILLER MICROS! Well, even if I agree with the fundamental point, this might be a teeny bit strong :-) 1) Supers and mini-supers and mainframes still do things that micros don't yet, like huge memories, and very fast I/O, or very high connectivity, or very high bandwidths in more places. Those things cost money. One can hope that having fast cheap micros will induce people to build more fast cheap peripheral chips to help some parts of the problems. Some things will always cost money, no matter what. 2) It's hard to believe that there will not always be a niche for: a) The fastest box, at almost any cost b) Very fast boxes with good cost/performance 3) The issue raised really is: How big are those niches? How many companies can thrive in them? 4) OPINION: 1-2 companies each in both a) and b). This is a high-stakes game, and the ante to play keeps rising. 5) OBSERVATION: RISC micros are munching away at the lower levels of the minisuper business; going up (i.e., CONVEX) was a good strategy. Trying to fight it out with them where they can do the job, is like the fight that huge horde of 1970s mini- makers had with CISC micros: once the latter got to be reasonably competitive on performance, the former just got run over, except for the very biggest players. 6) An interesting paper is: "SUPERCOMPUTING, Myth & Reality", by George J. Luste, of the Physics Department at U. Toronto. (I think this was in Supercomputing Symposium '89). This was a nice intro to some of the issues of vector code versus scalar code, and cost/performance issues of supercomputers versus RISC micros. -- -john mashey DISCLAIMER: UUCP: {ames,decwrl,prls,pyramid}!mips!mash OR mash@mips.com DDD: 408-991-0253 or 408-720-1700, x253 USPS: MIPS Computer Systems, 930 E. Arques, Sunnyvale, CA 94086