Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!purdue!haven!decuac!netsys!vector!telecom-gateway From: RS%AI.AI.MIT.EDU@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu (Robert E. Seastrom) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Phone Design For Humans Message-ID: Date: 9 Oct 89 15:57:24 GMT Lines: 15 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us In TELECOM Digest V9 #434 you write: > [Moderator's Note: In my office, I have a Comdial 2500 phone with a TAP > button. It's a great help with call-waiting, etc. PT] We have two of these here at the house. I've disabled the Sure-Hangup feature on the switchhook after getting zapped once too many when flashing in the traditional manner. They're pretty decent phones, good sound quality and all, but I do wish that they were a bit more tolerable to physical abuse. These phones are in the kitchen and are forever getting yanked off the counter and hitting the floor. Do you know of any other phones besides the WECO 2500 that are really tolerant of living in a house full of abusive hackers? ---Rob