Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!rutgers!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: peggy@ddsw1.mcs.com (Peggy Shambo) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: The Hottest Answering Machine Message-ID: Date: 14 Oct 89 18:46:50 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Reply-To: peggy@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Peggy Shambo) Organization: ddsw1.MCS.COM Contributor, Mundelein, IL Lines: 24 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 454, message 8 of 9 In article Lee_C._Moore.WBST128@ xerox.com writes: >X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 440, message 5 of 12 >Because of a service person who went wild in my house, I am now >shopping for a new answering machine. I am taking this opportunity to >by a top-of-the-line machine. Is there any machine that is currently >considered the best, hottest or most feature-full (consumer) answering >machine? >If there is sufficient interest, I will summarize for the group. Well, I don't know a heck of a lot about top-of-the-line answering machines, but my curiosity has been piqued as to the nature of this "service person" and what really happened to the old answering machine. Enquiring minds want to know. Does this qualify for the "sufficient interest" clause? :-) Peg Shambo | Anybody know of any IDMS/ADSO positions in peggy@ddsw1.mcs.com | the South of England? (London, Southampton, | Portsmouth, Bournemouth would all be nice)