Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!sunic!tut!jh From: jh@tut.fi (Hein{nen Juha) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: NSAP address formats Message-ID: Date: 20 Oct 89 10:52:24 GMT Sender: News@tut.fi Distribution: comp Organization: Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland. Lines: 13 The NSAP address format in GOSIP 2.0 seems to be different that any of the two routable address formats (nbs, osinet) supported by the recent SunLink OSI 6.0 implementation. Any ideas why there is this difference and what to do about it? The next version of Cisco router software also supports ISO IP. Does anyone know which address formats its routing is based on? Are we expecting to see conformance to the GOSIP 2.0 format and if so, how long will it take? -- -- Juha Heinanen, Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland jh@tut.fi (Internet), tut!jh (UUCP), jh@tut (Bitnet)