Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!ncis.tis.llnl.gov!NAC.NO!alf-hansen%vax.runit.unit.uninett
From: alf-hansen%vax.runit.unit.uninett@NAC.NO (Alf Hansen)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Notes from the Bari meeting of the ISO messaging group
Message-ID: <1982*alf-hansen@vax.runit.unit.uninett>
Date: 18 Oct 89 15:21:00 GMT
References: <456333@QZCOM>
Sender: root@ncis.tis.llnl.gov
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 13
Approved: post-x400@tis.llnl.gov

Just a stupid thought: 

Why not use RFC 822 as a concise format? With the RFC 987
mapping rules for <space> etc? Thus we will get the 
globally aggreed RFC 822/X.400 address mapping rule as a very
important side-product?

I guess this is not a serious comment because then we will have
repeated ..  in the address like Hugh.Smith@Nothingham_University..Gold_400.GB
Is this allowed in RFC 822?
I am sure it is not. Sorry.

Alf H.