Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!THUMPER.BELLCORE.COM!nsb
From: nsb@THUMPER.BELLCORE.COM (Nathaniel Borenstein)
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.andrew
Subject: Re: messages bug
Message-ID: <UZDTQFC0M2YtQCCI1E@thumper.bellcore.com>
Date: 19 Oct 89 16:32:17 GMT
References: <YZDT0Cy1eVew1mDVYL@northstar.dartmouth.edu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 6

Interesting.  Actually, we never even tried to define the semantics for
multiple enclosures.  The draft RFC we never published that described
enclosures never even touched on the issue.  The bottom line:  it never
occurred to me (as the person who conceived and implemented the
enclosure feature) that multiple enclosures were a possibility, so I'm
not in the least surprised that they don't work...  -- Nathaniel