Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!apollo!dawson From: dawson@apollo.HP.COM (Keith Dawson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo Subject: Re: Tek401x emulation Message-ID: <4643bbbb.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM> Date: 16 Oct 89 16:49:00 GMT References: <3452@orion.cf.uci.edu> Sender: root@apollo.HP.COM Reply-To: dawson@apollo.HP.COM (Keith Dawson) Organization: Hewlett-Packard Apollo Division - Chelmsford, MA Lines: 33 > The xterm in Apollo's X11 distribution DOES support Tektronix > mode; the way I read the comment in the release notes, Apollo > does not support that mode - meaning they won't try to fix it if > it doesn't work. The code is probably straight out of the > official X distribution, and I imagine it is reasonably robust. > I sure hope so - I intend to use it myself... This is about right. Versions of Domain/X11 for both SR9.7 and SR10.1 are based on X.V11R2 from MIT. The R2 xterm as it came from MIT had a number of problems including, we have been told, some in the Tek4014 code. We fixed a bunch of these on the VT100 side. The reason we don't offer Tek4014 support at SR9.7/SR10.1 is simply one of time and re- sources. Tek4014 should work as well as it does in any other pure MIT R2 X environment. At SR10.2, when X Window System support is bundled with base software (at no extra charge), we have moved to X.V11R3 for all libraries and clients. The R3 xterm is considerably cleaner; there are no outstand- ing problems reported against Tek4014. So we'll be supporting xterm Tek4014 at SR10.2. ____________________________________________________________ My opinions Keith Dawson Hewlett Packard Co. 508-256-0176 x5739 are my own. Graphics Technology Division / East 300 Apollo Dr. (CHR.03.DE) Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA My convictions Internet: dawson@apollo.hp.com are not for UUCP: {mit-eddie,yale,uw-beaver}!apollo!dawson public display. P.S. -- one reader got somewhat alarmed at the signature above. The Apollo Systems Division is alive and quite well. I just don't happen to work in that division.