Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: Mac sounds on IIGS [Was: Re: IIGS Sound Digitizers]
Message-ID: <11342@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 19 Oct 89 10:58:39 GMT
References: <8910161512.AA17112@trout.nosc.mil> <5917@portia.Stanford.EDU>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 7

In article <5917@portia.Stanford.EDU> unknown@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Unknown User) writes:
>I don't know why they don't sound quite as good but they're still good enough.

It may have something to do with a design botch in the IIGS use of the
Ensoniq, in that a 0 sound level does something unexpected (documented,
so it's an official "feature").  I don't have my references at hand.
Try changing all 0 bytes to contain 1 instead and see if it sounds better.