Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!phoenix From: phoenix@ms.uky.edu (R'ykandar Korra'ti) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Amiga's ad blitz Message-ID: <12966@s.ms.uky.edu> Date: 17 Oct 89 18:44:38 GMT References: <2961@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> <4669@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU> Reply-To: phoenix@ms.uky.edu (R'ykandar Korra'ti) Distribution: usa Organization: El'n'tk National Spaceport, Mission Control Lines: 38 /Line Eaters 'R Us/ All about advertising - if you don't care, skip it now... In article <4669@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU> don@vax1.acs.udel.EDU (Donald R Lloyd) writes: >The Amiga ads were on Fox? They were supposed to be on all the networks, >and the big "Kickoff" of them was supposed to be during last night's football >game. I taped it & fast-forwarded through the whole thing... not one amiga >commercial. ...in some areas, yes. The commercials weren't network-feed, they were handed to the local stations. Some local stations didn't run them (like the local ABC affiliate) which is legal/acceptable/all that. Yesterday as a whole was the start of the CBM/Amiga ad campaign, from what I understand. > And they were supposed to start printed ads in Time, Newsweek, and Life, >but the new issue of Time is out, and no Amiga. So far, it's not much of >a media "blitz." From what I understood, the print ads in Time and etc aren't supposed to start yet. (In fact, I don't know what the exact start date is.) The TV ads will be for the A500; the print ads, as I understand it, will be for the A2000 and A2500 in professional settings. The Time/Newsweek/Life(?) ads are supposed to be seven-page series ads. The goal, again as I understand it (I do not now and have never worked for CBM) is to have 95-98% of the US to have seen at least two Amiga commercials by the end of the year. To this end, CBM will be spending some $14 million in advertising, putting it into the list of "Top 80" advertisers, ahead of both IBM and Apple for the quarter. BTW, for those interested; I'm the person who talked about the Atari ST emulator for the Amiga before. I still have not found a working copy. As I stated in an earlier post (to c.s.a), I am still working on finding out whether this thing actually exists in viable form. Both copies I have had have arrived "damaged;" specifically, the writers of the emulator used "hidden" files (_not!_ part of the operating system) which were apparently partially destroyed in transit from the point of origination in Austrailia. - R'ykandar. -- | R'ykandar Korra'ti, Editor, LOW ORBIT | phoenix@ms.uky.edu | CIS 72406,370 | | Elfinkind, Unite! | phoenix@ukma.bitnet | PLink: Skywise | QLink: Bearclaw |