Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!udel!princeton!phoenix!jwbirdsa From: jwbirdsa@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (James Webster Birdsall) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: SONY monitor info request Message-ID: <10924@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> Date: 19 Oct 89 01:57:01 GMT References: <782@megatek.UUCP> Reply-To: jwbirdsa@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (James Webster Birdsall) Organization: Princeton University, NJ Lines: 15 In article <782@megatek.UUCP> jonson@zorro.UUCP (Henrik Jonson) writes: >Note that you need to match your monitor and your video card output, >ie. BOTH need to be interlaced or NON-interlaced (NON is better). Theoretically, it's better. I own the Seiko 1430, which (I recently discovered by carefully scanning the docs) is interlaced. It's really not easy to tell. I've had it for a month now and only today produced an interlaced screen which wasn't rock-steady. Don't let interlacing scare you off. It can be done well. -- James W. Birdsall jwbirdsa@phoenix.Princeton.EDU jwbirdsa@pucc.BITNET ...allegra!princeton!phoenix!jwbirdsa Compu$erve: 71261,1731 "For it is the doom of men that they forget." -- Merlin