Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!cbnewsc!olaf From: olaf@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (olaf.henjum) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: COBOL, power cycles, and hard disks Keywords: COBOL for PCs, acceptable power cycling, manual disk parking Message-ID: <4005@cbnewsc.ATT.COM> Date: 20 Oct 89 16:56:10 GMT Distribution: na Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 35 Thanks very much to all of you who responded to my last posting. I now have more answers than I need to my questions on BASIC and Lotus 1-2-3 (indeed, several variations on the same answers, both of which have already been posted to the net by somebody else). However, (1) I could still use some more feedback on "good" implementations of COBOL for PCs. So far, no two people have made the same recommendation! I also have a couple of other "beginner" questions which I'd like to get some confirmation on (i.e. I think I already know the answer, but it would be nice to have it confirmed): (2) My understanding is that frequent power cycling (i.e. shutting off the PC/AT whenever it's not in use) cannot cause damage to or in any other way hasten the wearing out of any part of the PC. Is this really true? Or is it better for the machine to leave it running 24 hours a day as much as possible? (3) I've gotten conflicting information on the necessity of manually parking the hard disk heads before powering down the machine. Some people have told me that one should ALWAYS do this for ANY kind of PC or PC-clone. Others have said that this is necessary only for the PC/XT due to a design flaw in the first XTs that came out, and that AT machines automatically park the heads correctly whenever they're powered down (i.e. there's no need to manually run some utility program to do it). I would tend to believe the second account, but again it would be nice to have it confirmed. As before, any help you might be able to provide to any one of these questions would be GREATLY appreciated! -- Olaf Henjum (arpa!att!ihlpf!olaf)