Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!execu!sequoia!rpp386!jfh
From: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Subject: Re: Broken SCCS?
Summary: Nope, works fine here.
Message-ID: <17130@rpp386.cactus.org>
Date: 13 Oct 89 13:20:29 GMT
References: <1286@dialog.UUCP> <5796@portia.Stanford.EDU>
Reply-To: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II)
Organization: TrishTrash Readers, Inc.
Lines: 22
X-Disclaimer: I speak for myself only.

In article <5796@portia.Stanford.EDU> karish@forel.stanford.edu (Chuck Karish) writes:
>In article <1286@dialog.UUCP> root@dialog.UUCP (Christian Motz) wrote:
>>Does SCCS under AIX 2.2.1 need any kind of special setup? Or have I
>>stumbled onto a bug? If so, is this a known bug of 2.2.1? I would appreciate
>>any hints ...
>
>I haven't seen this behavior.  We have a large SCCS archive that's
>accessed several hundred times a week, always by ordinary users,
>some from the source server (2.2.1) system and some by NFS from other
>2.2.1, 2.2, and non-IBM systems.

At AWD all of the AIX sources are kept under SCCS.  This stuff is
accessed thousands of times a day and I've never heard of any trouble,
other than an RT runs slow if you put more than 100 people on it ;-)

Your s-files may be corrupt.  You might want to examine your data files
by hand and see if the contents are correct.
-- 
John F. Haugh II                        +-Things you didn't want to know:------
VoiceNet: (512) 832-8832   Data: -8835  | The real meaning of MACH is ...
InterNet: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org         |    ... Messages Are Crufty Hacks.
UUCPNet:  {texbell|bigtex}!rpp386!jfh   +--------------------------------------