Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mips:223 comp.sys.mac.hardware:5 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!grunwald From: grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu (Dirk Grunwald) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mips,comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Re: Workstation speed comparisons Message-ID: <12855@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Date: 17 Oct 89 00:29:20 GMT References: <12850@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU Reply-To: grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu Distribution: na Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder Lines: 32 In-reply-to: jdm@boulder.Colorado.EDU's message of 16 Oct 89 23:08:00 GMT Using MIPS ratings doesn't work out very well for actual performance. What follows is from comp.windows.x; it's the results for a heavily scalar floating point intensive program. For scientific applications, it'll show you the benefits better than raw MIPS ratings. For simple interactive use, all of these machines are pretty fast & you should really be looking at things like IO & context switches/second. ----------from comp.windows.x---------- Here is the 2nd updated list of xfroot fractal-points/processor_second measured on various clients. The number, a count of trips/second through the 8 line "hopalong" loop in xfroot, is a rough index of scalar double-precision floating point uniprocessor speed. New items since the last posting are marked with ">". Cray X-MP 157,000 to 194,000* (*=per processor) Cray 2 129,000 to 183,000* > Convex C2 (gcc) 117,000 to 151,000* > Convex C2 (vc3/fastmath) 108,000 to 138,000* > Convex C2 (vc3) 99,000 to 118,000* DEC DS5800 95,000 to 115,000 DEC DS5400 77,000 to 91,000 DEC DS3100 58,000 to 75,000 <<<<<<<<<<<<<< Gould NP1 44,000 to 60,000* DEC Vax 6400 (vcc) 50,000 to 57,000 Convex C2 (vc2) 49,000 to 55,000* Convex C2 (cc) 41,000 to 47,000* > Dec Vax 8650 28,000 to 33,000 Sun Sparcstation 1 ~25,000 to <<<<<<<<<<<<<< DEC MV3900 (vcc) 22,900 to 26,100 > DG AViiON (88k 16.7 MHz) 17,200 to 24,200 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<