Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!oliveb!mipos3!td2cad!brister
From: brister@td2cad.intel.com (James Brister)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: {g,n,}awk vs. /=/
Message-ID: <BRISTER.89Oct15102425@aries.td2cad.intel.com>
Date: 15 Oct 89 17:24:25 GMT
References: <9157@elsie.UUCP>
Sender: news@td2cad.intel.com
Distribution: usa
Organization: Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA, USA
Lines: 11
In-reply-to: ado@elsie.UUCP's message of 15 Oct 89 00:00:08 GMT

In article <9157@elsie.UUCP> ado@elsie.UUCP (Arthur David Olson) writes:
>  And Sun people claim it is not a bug in awk; the awk writeups are to be
>  changed to explain the situation, though.

If I write a program that has a bug in it, and then after I discover the bug I
change the documentation to reflect the bug, isn't it a bug any more? :-)

James
--
James Brister                                          brister@td2cad.intel.com
Intel Corp.                                      {decwrl,oliveb}!td2cad!brister