Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!bloom-beacon!EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU!rws From: rws@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Bob Scheifler) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: XIOErrorHandler Message-ID: <8910161324.AA02566@expire.lcs.mit.edu> Date: 16 Oct 89 13:24:21 GMT References: <100689.093908.dan@watson.ibm.com> Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 12 Is this an IBM problem, or is it a genetic defect? It is a genetic defect in Unix, not X. I can get around the problem by saying "signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);" in my application, but I think this call should be in Xlib. Sorry, I have to disagree. Signals are a scarce resource, and SIGPIPE might be used/handled by the application for other reasons. Having Xlib step on the signal handler would be a significant incompatible change.