Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!rpi!crdgw1!lewis.crd.ge.com!welty From: welty@lewis.crd.ge.com (richard welty) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: While we're talking about global changes in newsgroups... Message-ID: <2833646442@lewis.crd.ge.com> Date: 17 Oct 89 20:00:42 GMT References: <6532@ficc.uu.net> Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com Reply-To: welty@lewis.crd.ge.com (richard welty) Followup-To: news.groups Organization: New York State Institute for Sebastian Cabot Studies Lines: 37 In article <6532@ficc.uu.net>, Peter da Silva writes: about some easy namespace cleanups. *news.software.misc I know C-news is B-news compatible, but there will * be others. Besides, anu news is B-compatible as well. * I think the important factor is the overall software * design, not what it interoperates with. C-news is * very little like B-news internally. good idea. i still don't understand why Bill Wisner's vote for news.software failed; i voted yes then and i'd vote yes again. *rec.models.misc We have .rc, and a demand for .rocket. How about * making a rec.models.misc (or rec.models) to keep * this from turning into a hydra? This is probably * the most obvious and important of these changes. i agree very much. i'd even volunteer to run a vote for either rec.models or rec.models.misc. note that i agree that there isn't much difference between foo.bar and foo.bar.misc as group names; the namespace is already totally confused on this score anyway; we have rec.autos, rec.autos.tech, and rec.autos.sport on the one hand, and rec.sports.misc, rec.sports.basketball, and so forth on the other. i'd just soon see rec.models and news.software created without the .misc, but i wouldn't vote no if we wanted to go the other way. anyway, i think i'll start discussion on rec.models in the very near future. richard -- richard welty 518-387-6346, GE R&D, K1-5C39, Niskayuna, New York ..!crdgw1!lewis.crd.ge.com!welty welty@lewis.crd.ge.com