Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!watmath!looking!brad
From: brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Sci.aquaria vote in violation of the rules?
Message-ID: <35302@looking.on.ca>
Date: 18 Oct 89 05:12:03 GMT
References: <8307@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <1989Oct17.060301.1344@agate.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton)
Organization: Looking Glass Software Ltd.
Lines: 17
Class: rebuttal

In article <1989Oct17.060301.1344@agate.berkeley.edu> gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith) writes:
>
>  As was pointed out on news.announce.newgroups, the call for
>votes is in violation of points 2 and 3 above. I don't think the
>net should regard itself as bound in any way by the vote, even if
>positive. Why not just not send any newgroup message, and thus
>end it?

I don't mean to be rude, but are you out of your mind?

Shortening the aqauria discussion is a blessing from the Lord, and I
don't even believe in Him!

Note also that these are not votes, and even a perfectly conducted
one is not binding on the net in any way.
-- 
Brad Templeton, ClariNet Communications Corp. -- Waterloo, Ontario 519/884-7473