Xref: utzoo alt.aquaria:4266 news.groups:13384
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!ginosko!usc!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!usenet
From: gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.aquaria,news.groups
Subject: Re: Call of votes - sci.aquaria (sort of moderated)
Message-ID: <1989Oct19.054829.12190@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 19 Oct 89 05:48:29 GMT
References: <20986@gryphon.COM> <35689@apple.Apple.COM> <3248@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu> <9061@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <3252@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu> <2687@cpoint.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Reply-To: gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith)
Followup-To: alt.aquaria
Organization: Garnet Gang Gems of Wisdom, Inc.
Lines: 13
In-reply-to: alien@cpoint.UUCP (Alien Wells)

In article <2687@cpoint.UUCP>, alien@cpoint (Alien Wells) writes:
>
>Sci. groups are NOT meant as a forum for scientists to discuss scientific
>research

  Maybe if the turkeys would take their droppings elsewhere, they
would work better at this job. As it is, research problems are
sometimes discussed on sci groups. I think if people get the idea
that sci is another word for rec or talk, this will be less
likely to happen.
--
ucbvax!garnet!gsmith     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720
 This posting was made possible by a grant from the Mobil Corporation