Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!gryphon!richard
From: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.architecture
Summary: Excuse me, I'm going to rant now. I deserve it.
Message-ID: <21078@gryphon.COM>
Date: 19 Oct 89 08:44:42 GMT
Reply-To: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)
Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA
Lines: 22

In article <19792@ut-emx.UUCP> ifab750@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Matthew S. Cohen) writes:
>I was wondering if there was any interest in the creation of a
>group which would hold discussions about Architecture?
>I am assuming this would be a talk group 

Whao!

You can get an advanced degree in it so it clearly belongs in sci
except
it's probably just a hobby for you in which case it clearly belongs in rec
unless
you don't do it for a hobby, you do it for a living in which case clearly
it belongs in biz
unless
you mean computers in which case it already exists.

Fuck it. Make it an alt group. Then you don't have to figure
out which hierarchy it goes in and you can post to it tomorrow.

-- 
            Help wipe out BBQ lighter fluid in your lifetime
richard@gryphon.COM  decwrl!gryphon!richard   gryphon!richard@elroy.jpl.NASA.GOV