Xref: utzoo news.groups:13396 alt.aquaria:4276 rec.pets:8808 Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ginosko!usc!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!gryphon!oleg From: oleg@gryphon.COM (Oleg Kiselev) Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.aquaria,rec.pets Subject: Re: Formal propsal: "rec.aquarium", not to be confused with "sci.aquaria". Message-ID: <21087@gryphon.COM> Date: 19 Oct 89 10:39:14 GMT References: <8215@cbmvax.UUCP> Reply-To: oleg@gryphon.COM (Oleg Kiselev) Organization: HASA Lines: 35 In article <8215@cbmvax.UUCP> bryce@commodore.COM (Bryce Nesbitt) writes: >I hereby formally propose a new newsgroup to be called "rec.aquarium". This is a complete idiocy and I appeal to ALL OF YOU (those who are in favour of sci.aquaria or rec.aquaria or misc.aquaria) to vote NO on this attempt of blatant sabotage by someone who does not have any interest in the group or at least ignore it! >Improperly formatted votes will be returned to sender uncounted. And this miscreant is even too lazy to worry about the "improper" formats! Does this sound to you like an honest effort by a person with a genuine concern for the group and for the aquaria in general?! >A grab for better distribution is not reason for a new "sci" group. There is a real chance that the aquarium scientists will join that group (the names of Cabrillo Museum and Monterey Bay Aquariums have been mentioned). Those people are NOT hobbyists and what they do is not recreation. Then again, this "proposal" is made by someone who works for a toy computer manufacturer, so I guess he is just acting out his guilt over slipping "commodore" and "amiga" groups into COMP hierarchy, rather than rec.games.* where they belong. >The name "aquarium" is used for absolute clarity. No, it's chosen out of ignorance! Aquaria is a PLURAL of aquarium. PLEASE VOTE NO! -- "No regrets, no apologies" Ronald Reagan Oleg Kiselev ARPA: lcc.oleg@seas.ucla.edu, oleg@gryphon.COM (213)337-5230 UUCP: [world]!{ucla-se|gryphon}!lcc!oleg