Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!texbell!nuchat!splut!jay
From: jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: is it recreational or technical ?
Message-ID: <2957@splut.conmicro.com>
Date: 19 Oct 89 15:39:32 GMT
References: <21042@gryphon.COM> <2952@splut.conmicro.com> <21076@gryphon.COM>
Reply-To: jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard)
Organization: Confederate Microsystems, League City, TX
Lines: 13

In article <21076@gryphon.COM> richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton) writes:
>When I think rec I think TV and football. I believe that technical
>groups in rec as as misplaced as .philosophy is in sci.

When I think rec I think hobbies. Everyone, yourself included, agrees
that aquaria is a hobby subject. What's the problem? Next, you'll be
proposing sci.ham-radio.

-- 
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL   | Never ascribe to malice that which can
jay@splut.conmicro.com       (eieio)| adequately be explained by stupidity.
{attctc,bellcore}!texbell!splut!jay +----------------------------------------
   Send richard@gryphon.com your NO vote on sci.aquaria; it belongs in rec.