Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!hacgate!gryphon!richard
From: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: is it recreational or technical ?
Summary: sigh.aquaria
Message-ID: <21126@gryphon.COM>
Date: 20 Oct 89 16:35:16 GMT
References: <21042@gryphon.COM> <2952@splut.conmicro.com> <21076@gryphon.COM> <2957@splut.conmicro.com>
Reply-To: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)
Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA
Lines: 22

In article <2957@splut.conmicro.com> jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard) writes:
>
>When I think rec I think hobbies. Everyone, yourself included, agrees
>that aquaria is a hobby subject. What's the problem? Next, you'll be
>proposing sci.ham-radio.

Every day, I hear: ``if it's a hobby, it goes in rec''.

Half of the comp groups cover hobbies - go ahead, TELL ME
people play hack for a living (yeah, *I know* they get paid for it
already).

I've consistently seen more science in talk.origins than sci.bio.

But no, I don't think a ham radio group shoul go in sci. It
should goin tech. Of course at this point I'm trying to figure
out what should go in sci.


-- 
                  Surgical tools for mutant women
richard@gryphon.COM  decwrl!gryphon!richard   gryphon!richard@elroy.jpl.NASA.GOV